2023年11月22日托福家考回顾真题机经

环球教育合肥托福培训机构提供：2023年11月22日托福家考回顾真题机经：写作整套重复！关注环球教育合肥分校微信公众号，获取更多保定托福考试资讯。

综合写作

主题：大猩猩是否使用过一种重型工具

阅读总观点：使用过，三大证据

阅读分论点一：留下的痕迹与现代猩猩使用工具留的痕迹相似

阅读分论点二：用途相似，主要砸果子

阅读分论点三：工具出现时间在人类出现之前，所以应该是猩猩用的

听力总观点：反驳

听力分论点一：工具的大小、重量其实猿人也可以用的了

听力分论点二：好像猩猩并不能吃上面阅读提到的食物？（待考证）

听力分论点三：虽然工具出现的区域在当时没有人类定居，但是有人类访问过

学术讨论写作

【完全重复0730家考/0823线下】

Dr.Achebe

This week, we'll be discussing ways to address air pollution. One idea is introducing environmental taxes on air travel. Such taxes, also referred to as ecological taxes or green taxes, are extra charges that get added to the price of airplane tickets.Money collected from these taxes could be invested in environmentally friendly technologies

or in promoting other, cleaner modes of transportation. Do you think there should be an environmental tax on air travel? Why or why not?

Andrew

We should impose environmental taxes on air travel. These taxes might encourage people to find cheaper. more eco-friendly ways to get places. In my country, many people use planes to fly a short distance because flights are relatively cheap, when they could just as easily take a less polluting form of transportation.

Claire

Additional taxes on air travel will do little to solve the problem of air pollution. Airplane tickets would become more expensive, punishing passengers without incentivizing airlines to become more environmentally friendly. The airlines should pay the price to protect the environment, not their customers.

可行角度：

air taxes==>less people will choose to take planes==>less pollution==>less people will suffer from lung and heart illnesses==> air taxes is needed

air taxes==>only reduce part of carbon emission==>cars on road continue to emit carbon dioxide and may produce more than that of plane in total sum==>air tax is not effective